Good morning all. Here in Aspen we will holding a 30 minute review to kick off the two week review period for beman.indirect from David Sankel. You can find the repo here GitHub - bemanproject/indirect: Vocabulary types for composite class design (std::indirect and std::polymorphic) · GitHub
You can find notes a description of the review process here beman_library_maturity_model | The Beman Project . Note that this will be the first of 3 overlapping reviews and this we plan to use these to refine the process. The review period will be two weeks.
How to provide feedback.
This topic was raised yesterday and the current process description doesn’t cover it well. Per the dicussion in library in a week we recommend the following:
- General comments, positive, etc: post on this thread
- Code bugs - create a repo issue for each deficiency preferablly with a unit test
- Documentation issues - best create an issue and PR for fix, ok create an issue
Note on AI reviews
It’s fine to use AI to assist in code review, but please don’t spam – confirm what the AI has generated and make sure it’s relevant.